Financial fraud is a broad term that cost the United States billions of dollars annually. There are numerous state and federal agencies that regulate, prevent and punish financial fraud when necessary.  Most people are familiar with the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC).. CLICK TO READ MORE!

Ryan Griffith, Resolving Criminal Nuisance Properties Through Civil Litigation, California Daily Journal, October 10, 2022.

University of Massachusetts Law Review Publication Ryan Griffith, How cities and fix dangerous properties and increase revenue, Daily Journal Ryan Griffith Zombie Foreclosure What is it and How Can it Be Fixed, Daily Journal

Click to read more.

Many properties have major building violations that are visible to the naked eye. Cities can abate these properties by red tagging them. Then, using Health and Safety Receiverships, codified at California Health and Safety Code sections 17980.6 & 17980.7, to rehabilitate and sell the property under court supervision.

However, what can cities do with properties that look acceptable, yet terrorize a neighborhood? These can be motels where numerous drug deals occur and violence is rampant. These nuisances can also take the shape of residential homes operating as unlicensed casinos that cause significant traffic into the night, drunken fights in the streets, and other neighborhood disturbances that deteriorate confidence in community leadership. To address these scenarios, the California legislature created two statutory schemes. These statutory schemes are codified at California Health and Safety Code § 11570 et seq. and Penal Code § 11225 et seq., and are known as the Drug and Red-Light Abatement Acts respectively.

Read more at Daily Journal

 

Ryan Griffith
COMMENT: IS OUT-OF-STATE TUITION UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND COULD REMOVING IT EASE THE UNITED STATES STUDENT DEBT CRISIS?

Abstract
This article argues that for the good of the nation the discriminatory practice of charging out-of-state tuition should be ceased and that under the Privileges and Immunities Clause, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment, this practice has violated the law for decades.

Recommended Citation
Ryan Griffith, COMMENT: IS OUT-OF-STATE TUITION UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND COULD REMOVING IT EASE THE UNITED STATES’ STUDENT DEBT CRISIS?, 52 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. (2022).
https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulrev/vol52/iss2/3

Amost every city has abandoned, vacant, fire damaged, or otherwise  dilapidated properties. Often these properties blight neighborhoods for years, while endangering communities, driving down property values, and harming neighbor hood morale. The neighborhood hopes and expects the city to fix the situation. Unfortunately, most citizens are unfamiliar with government departments and assume the city will just figure it out. Perhaps citizens should expect more from their government. Hopefully, one day the government will run without any flaws, defects or other deficiencies.
Unfortunately, in 2021, while city governments do a great deal, like every other company, individual and organization, city governments have imperfections, which need improvement.
As it relates to nuisance properties, the problem requires exploration and explanation..CLICK TO READ MORE!

Every city has a fire damaged abandoned, vacant or other wise blighted property within its borders. Severe nuisance properties surface for numerous reasons. These reason can include property owners dying without heirs, zombie foreclosures …CLICK TO READ MORE!

On behalf of the University of Massachusetts Law Review, it is my pleasure to extend to you an offer to
publish your Article, A Breath of Fresh Air: A Constitutional Amendment Legalizing Marijuana Through a
Convention of the States, in Volume 16 of our Journal.
Your Article typifies the high level of legal scholarship that we at the University of Massachusetts Law Review
endeavor to publish. In addition to being exceptionally well-researched and written, your Article provides
thoughtful perspective as to how a collective effort of the States—when exercising their Article V Convention
privilege—can affect beneficial and successful changes and legalize marijuana nationally. Our Editorial Board
was impressed by your ability to ground your analysis in skillfully curated case law, federal legislation, and
important historical explication. Needless to say, we found your arguments novel, timely, and well-articulated
and are elated at the prospect of featuring this piece.
As the Commonwealth’s first and only public institution for legal education, the University of Massachusetts
School of Law stands as a hallmark of excellence, resilience, and educational ingenuity. Our unwavering
commitment to scholarly achievement has gained both local and national recognition. Most recently, our law
school was found to be the most diverse in the Commonwealth. The formal recognition simply demonstrates our
ongoing dedication to ensuring cultural competency in the legal field.
As stated, we find that A Breath of Fresh Air: A Constitutional Amendment Legalizing Marijuana Through a
Convention of the States exemplifies the exceptional degree of scholarship and genuine passion reflected in the
University of Massachusetts Law Review Journal. We look forward to working with you throughout the editing
process and are happy to do anything we can to accommodate your needs and ensure that your Article is
published in a way that reflects the time and effort you have devoted to this topic.
Your interest in the University of Massachusetts Law Review is truly appreciated and we hope that you will
consider us at the top of your publication list. I look forward to your decision by April 16, 2020 at 8:00 p.m.
Again, we commend you on all your hard work and accomplishments and are honored to be considered for
publishing your Article. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns that may arise.

Story By: Ben HensleyPatrick Henslee, and Moises Buitrago

Ed Madec, men’s basketball head coach at Fresno City College and his attorney, Ryan Griffith, appeared in a courtroom filled with supporters, including much of the 2019-2020 men’s basketball team, in an attempt to overturn the temporary restraining order filed against Madec the previous week, on Thursday, Feb. 27.

The presiding Judicial Officer Kimberly Gaab rejected the appeal after hearing arguments from both sides — Madec’s attorney, Griffith as well as Matthew Besmer, legal counsel for the State Center Community College District.

On Feb. 19, Fresno City College administrators notified Madec that he would go on paid  administrative leave on Feb. 21, pending an investigation into potential California Community College Athletic Association rules violations.

In accordance with the California Education Code, employees must be given a two-day notice prior to being placed on administrative leave.

On Feb. 24, Madec filed an appeal to retain his position as head coach of the men’s basketball team – a position he has held since 2006, during which time he led the Rams to 14 consecutive titles, two state championships — not counting the numerous student transfers to four-year colleges around the country.

The Complaint

According to court documents, Madec was brought up for investigation by the SCCCD into potential CCCAA rules violations in early 2019. The investigation stemmed from alleged rules violations regarding the providing of special privileges to his players — a violation of the CCCAA decorum policy.

Court documents indicate that Madec owned three properties from 2013 to 2019, allegedly housing numerous students in that timeframe. In the documents,

“I understand since June 2013, Mr. Madec has owned three different properties for various periods of time in which his basketball players may have resided,” Carole Goldsmith, president of Fresno City College, said.

Goldsmith also said she only knew the extent of the violations around Feb. 4, 2020.

The court documents detail the numerous attempts by district investigators to acquire information from Madec regarding proof of legal tenant occupation status as well as tax return information failed.

Madec handed over only rental receipts to investigators, according to statements from both Goldsmith and Besmer.

The FCC administration made the decision to place Madec on leave because of alleged misdirection and noncompliance in the investigation process by both Madec and members of his basketball team.

On Feb. 17, just two days before being notified of his leave, Madec refused to turn over his and his mother’s personal tax returns which were requested by investigators. They wanted these documents to ascertain whether or not Madec had provided special privileges to his players in the form of housing.

Court statements indicate that Madec was absent from an investigative interview on Jan. 21. He also refused to cooperate with investigators during a rescheduled investigative interview on Jan. 24, leading investigators to conclude that his responses lacked credibility.

Additionally, many of the members of the 2019-2020 basketball team who were contacted during the investigation refused to cooperate, leading investigators to believe that Madec was influencing potential witnesses not to cooperate with the investigation.

FCC administration placed Madec on paid administrative leave pending the completion of the investigation. Resulting punishment for violation of CCCAA rules can extend beyond the college’s basketball team; it could potentially punish the entire athletic department.

Madec, who has been on paid administrative leave since Feb. 21, will remain on leave for up to 90 days, at which time the SCCCD must justify the continued suspension no later than May 21.

Madec’s Defense

In January 2019, SCCCD opened an investigation on Madec to determine whether or not he provided special privileges to players.

According to court documents produced by Ryan Griffith, Madec’s attorney, the investigators conducted three separate interviews — two in 2019, and one in January 2020. Madec, according to his attorney, did not know why he was being investigated at the time.

Griffith also stated that although the CCCAA Constitution requires that the dates, times, locations and names of those involved must be disclosed to the individual under investigation,

this information — referred to in court documents as “Form A” — was not  submitted at the time of Madec’s leave.

Madec was placed on administrative leave on Feb. 19.

Madec’s attorney claims that the timing of the ensuing administrative leave was not coincidental, but a clear attempt by SCCCD to target the men’s basketball coach.

“Based on my review of the investigation to date, it seemed that defendants [FCC/SCCCD] were engaged in a fishing expedition against Plaintiff [Madec],” Griffith stated in motion filed on Feb. 27 to lift the temporary restraining order.

Photo by: Moises Buitrago
Following Ed Madec’s administrative leave multiple community members began to wear “We Support Ed Madec” t-shirts to the games.

The Fallout and the Students

“I’m devastated for Coach Madec. I’m absolutely devastated,” said Interim Co-Athletic Director Paul Keysaw.

The outcry for Madec to be reinstated has grown steadily in the weeks since the news broke. His supporters packed the courtroom during his appearance; several former players and others voiced their support of the embattled coach before the final regular season game on Feb 22.

T-shirts embossed with the words, “Jealousy is the tribute mediocrity pays to genius,” were worn by dozens in attendance during that game against Merced College on Feb. 22.

Segments, most notably on 940 ESPN Radio, have been dedicated solely in the interest of raising awareness to the general public.

But the thing that resonates among nearly all of the people voicing either support or condemnation of Madec was the impact of his suspension on the legacy of the athletics department, the students and athletes that make the program what it is.

“I feel so bad for his players,” Keysaw said.

“They didn’t sign up for this; they’re not part of this,” he said. “Unfortunately they’re pawns caught into this.”

This is a developing story.

Read article on the therampageonline.com